Faisalabad Wolves were denied permission to travel to India to play the Champions League T20 2013. This isn’t the first time when political tensions have spilled on to the sport arena. Yet, only the players are the affected party as umpires, coaches and commentators from Pakistan have featured in tournaments such as the Indian Premier League (IPL). Nishad Pai Vaidya looks at the inexplicable politicisation of the game.
Cricket is more than a sport in the sub-continent; it is a force that unites its diverse population. However, such is the power of the sport that it could alsoalso be used as a tool to sway public opinion and, in the process, deliver a “strong message.” The Indian Government recently denied the Faisalabad Wolves visa to participate in the Champions League T20 (CLT20) 2013. This comes after weeks of uncertainty in the backdrop of frosty diplomatic relations between the two sub-continental giants. This isn’t the first time a diplomatic tiff has affected cricket; time and again bilateral ties between the two neighbours have snapped due to simmering political discontent. But why is it that government only bars the Pakistani players in such situations?
From June 2000 to March 2003, India and Pakistan did not play against each other until relations warmed up in the mid-2000s. After India’s historic visit across the border, the two sides faced met quite regularly until 2008. Then, came the terrifying terror attacks on Mumbai, which led to another impasse. The only time they played each other was in multinational tournaments such as the World Cup or the Asia Cup. Pakistan’s tour to India in 2012-13 was seen as another positive move, until another stand-off surfaced.
Pakistani players haven’t played the Indian Premier League (IPL) after the first season. It was only during the CLT20 2012 that a Pakistani side featured in the competition. What is pertinent to note is that while the players are barred, one still finds Pakistani presence in such tournaments. Pakistani umpires, coaches and commentators from Pakistan have regularly figured in the IPL. Some of them have even been seen at India’s home fixtures. If the commentators and umpires are allowed, why are the players kept away? One fails to understand the logic behind it all. There is a clear intent to use the sport as a means to make a statement — a political one. Cricket is the most popular sport in both countries and reaches majority of their vast population. It is a matter of great pride for the players and the public to emerge triumphant in contests with their arch rivals.
It isn’t cricket alone that has borne the brunt in recent times. The Pakistan Hockey team’s visit to India was cancelled and so was a snooker tournament between the two countries.
But what’s perplexing is that when India-Pakistan relations haven’t been at their best, artists from across the border parade their skills on Indian soil. The Indian public, in fact, does appreciates them for their talents, than snub them for their nationality.
Why then is sport made an exception? It’s a question that the masses still can’t find a logical answer.
(Nishad Pai Vaidya is a Correspondent with CricketCountry and anchor for the site’s YouTube Channel. His Twitter handle is @nishad_44)