Johnny Wardle, born January 8, 1923, took 102 wickets in 28 Tests at an average and economy rate that rank among the best of all time. Arunabha Sengupta looks back at the man whose circumstances and attitude prevented him from achieving much more in his career.
When Ray Lindwall’s express delivery thudded into the thigh of the English tail-ender, a simultaneous gasp was heard around the stadium. The thousands gathered at Lord’s feared for the gutsy man at the wicket, who had boldly flailed the Australian pace — mostly off the edge of his willow. However, soon the collective concern was converted into peals of laughter as the man in question, hit resoundingly on the thigh, immediately began to rub his elbow. And when a flourishing cover drive soared over the slips for four, the same man grabbed an imaginary piece of chalk and rubbed his bat with a curious sense of purpose.
Indeed, without this ability to laugh at whatever fortune flung his way, often the chuckles of mirth aimed at himself, Johnny Wardle would have had a difficult time withstanding the cruel lashes of fate.
He was a canny left-arm spinner, perhaps the most innovative to bowl for England. He could propel them out from the back of his hand, with a Chinaman good enough to flummox the best, but most often stuck to the orthodox slow left arm stuff preferred by Yorkshire and England. Either way, he did a fabulous job.
Yet, his unfortunate career coincided with that of the more aggressive, and the more frequently favoured, left-arm spinner Tony Lock. It did not suit him well that England’s No. 1 spinner of that era, Jim Laker, accepted Lock as his spin-twin, and bowled in tandem with him for Surrey.
Spinner, rebel and prankster
There were other reasons why Johnny Wardle did not play too many Tests in spite of boasting a record better than Laker, Lock and most other spinners across eras. During a post-War era that stuck to convention and frowned upon the radical, Wardle was a confirmed maverick. Fred Trueman was another Yorkshireman who did not exactly toe the orthodox lines, and before the swinging sixties started to accept him as an icon, he too lost out on about fifty or so Test matches. Wardle paid a heavier price.
He dared to bowl Chinamen when left-arm spinners were supposed to tweak them with their fingers. At Durban in 1957, when England needed a victory to clinch the series in the third Test match, captain Peter May asked him to bowl orthodox left-arm spin. Wardle rebelled and bowled the dangerous Roy Mclean with a deceptive googly that came out from the back of his hand. When he informed May how he had got his man, the captain sternly repeated his instruction.
Wardle was also a joker, who needled the high and mighty. Once, on taking a blinder from the bat of Cyril Washbrook, he did not celebrate, and the batsman kept shuttling between the wickets, unaware that he was dismissed. “He hit the ball like a shell. It went straight to me, one hand, and I caught it. Washie was running for two, possibly three. He was proper upset and disgusted was Washie, because I’d make him look so silly,” Wardle recalled later. Washbrook served as a selector during the mid-1950s, and Wardle did not really gain too much by making him look silly.
According to his biographer Alan Hill, his penchant for clowning “masked his distress at the lack of appreciation of his talents… he was devalued as a bowler and as the heir to Hedley Verity and Wilfred Rhodes”.
And finally, when Ronnie Burnett was made the captain of Yorkshire ahead of him, Wardle wrote a series of articles for the Daily Mail criticising the county and its new skipper. Wardle had just come back from South Africa with 26 wickets at 13.81. But he played just one more Test. Following his newspaper articles, his invitation to tour Australia was withdrawn.
Hence, Wardle ended up playing only 28 Tests for England over nine years.
Even in these Tests, he was often restrained from achieving what he could. On his debut, in 1948, Gubby Allen allowed him only 3 overs as West Indies piled up 497. His response was to keep taking wickets, 148 in the English summer of 1948, more than 100 in each of the next nine seasons. With Trueman and Bob Appleyard, Wardle formed a bowling combination for Yorkshire seldom encountered in First-Class cricket.
At the international level, in spite of the few opportunities, he demonstrated what he could achieve given a long run. In 1953, he took 4 for 7 against Australia at Old Trafford, and the next year captured 7 for 56 against Pakistan at The Oval. It was a pity that he did not go to Australia in 1958-59. Four years earlier, when he had made the trip, he had practiced his back of the hand deliveries on the deck of Orsova and had managed quite a bit of success on a pace dominated tour.
In the end, his career haul of 102 wickets in 28 Tests at 20.39 stands out as both extraordinary and incredulous. More than underlining his claims as one of the greats of slow bowling, it emphasises the curious selection policies of England in the 1950s.
Among all the bowlers to have captured 100 or more wickets in Tests, only six have a lower average than Wardle. All those six played before the First World War, when wickets were unpredictable and batting much more of a game of chance.
And when it comes to consistent showing at home and abroad, Wardle stands quite some distance above the other great spinners of his land, including Laker, Tony Lock, Hedley Verity, Derek Underwood and Graeme Swann.
Only three bowlers with over hundred wickets ended with a better economy rate. Wardle was often a joker on the field, but he played hard and did not give an inch.
Four months after Laker picked up his famous haul of 19 for 90 at Manchester, Wardle bowled alongside him at Cape Town. Laker finished with 3 for 72 in 42.1 eight-ball overs. Wardle bowled five more balls, and took 12 wickets for 89.
A look at the tables that follow will perhaps underline how cruelly Wardle’s career was cut short and what he might have achieved given a longer run.
Bowlers with best averages (qualification 100 wickets)
Bowler
Period
T
Wkts
Ave
5WI
10WM
GA Lohmann (Eng)
1886-1896
18
112
10.75
9
5
SF Barnes (Eng)
1901-1914
27
189
16.43
24
7
CTB Turner (Aus)
1887-1895
17
101
16.53
11
2
R Peel (Eng)
1884-1896
20
101
16.98
5
1
J Briggs (Eng)
1884-1899
33
118
17.75
9
4
C Blythe (Eng)
1901-1910
19
100
18.63
9
4
JH Wardle (Eng)
1948-1957
28
102
20.39
5
1
AK Davidson (Aus)
1953-1963
44
186
20.53
14
2
MD Marshall (WI)
1978-1991
81
376
20.94
22
4
J Garner (WI)
1977-1987
58
259
20.97
7
0
Bowlers with best economy rate (qualification 100 wickets)
Bowler
T
Wkts
Ave
ER
TL Goddard (SA)
41
123
26.22
1.64
H Verity (Eng)
40
144
24.37
1.88
GA Lohmann (Eng)
18
112
10.75
1.88
JH Wardle (Eng)
28
102
20.39
1.89
R Illingworth (Eng)
61
122
31.2
1.91
CTB Turner (Aus)
17
101
16.53
1.93
MW Tate (Eng)
39
155
26.16
1.94
WJ O’Reilly (Aus)
27
144
22.59
1.94
HJ Tayfield (SA)
37
170
25.91
1.94
AL Valentine (WI)
36
139
30.32
1.95
Post World War I English spinners at home and away
Bowler
Wkts
Ave
Home Wkts
Ave
Away
wkts
Ave
JH Wardle
102
20.39
57
20.70
45
20.00
JC Laker
193
21.24
135
18.08
58
28.60
H Verity
144
24.37
80
22.26
64
27.01
GAR Lock
174
25.58
104
19.51
70
34.58
DL Underwood
297
25.83
145
24.24
152
27.36
GP Swann
212
29.13
84
30.55
128
28.20
(Arunabha Sengupta is a cricket historian and Chief Cricket Writer at CricketCountry.He writes about the history and the romance of the game, punctuated often by opinions about modern day cricket, while his post-graduate degree in statistics peeps through in occasional analytical pieces. The author of three novels, he can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/senantix)
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.