The question is did either Symonds or Broad break any rules by not walking? The answer, for better or worse, is no. And yet, a batsman edging and not walking is considered against the ‘Spirit of Cricket.’ However, an if umpire wrongly declares a batsman out LBW or does not uphold a correct “caught behind” appeal, the aggrieved parties are not even allowed to express their displeasure lest the match referee fine them. No one thinks of the ‘Spirit of Cricket’ in this scenario. READ: Five instances of Mankading in Test cricket
MS Dhoni called back Ian Bell during a Test in 2011 after the batsman unwisely left his crease thinking it was tea while the ball was still in play, and was praised for playing in the ‘Spirit of Cricket.’ It was clearly Bell’s fault for not paying attention, but he was not penalised for it. On the other hand, Muttiah Muralitharan was run out by Brendon McCullum in a Test in 2006 after leaving the crease to congratulate Kumar Sangakkara on a century while the ball was still in play. The umpire declared him out instantaneously and that was that. The move received its share of criticism but there was no denying that New Zealand were well within the laws of the game. READ: MCC refuses to change Mankading law
This brings us to Mankading, which is perhaps the most controversial of the lot. And yet, when you think about it, it is the most straightforward as well. If the batsman at the non-striker’s end stays in his crease he can never be Mankaded. If he leaves his crease, he needs to cover that much less distance while taking a run. We have seen numerous instances where a mere fraction of a second has been the difference between a batsman being run out or surviving. By leaving the crease early the batsman is giving himself the advantage; by that token the bowler should be able to get an advantage as well, in this case by getting the offending batsman run out. READ: Instances of ‘Mankading’ in cricket
Mankading is well within the laws of the game. Most bowlers will even give a warning prior to Mankading the batsman, but they do not need to do even that. Ian Bishop summed it up best when he said, after the controversial conclusion to the ICC Under-19 Cricket World Cup 2016 match between West Indies and Zimbabwe, “I think it has to come to the point where the batsman cannot aimlessly wander out of their crease. The real test of running is leaving your crease at the right time and completing your run at the right time. It’s the law.”
There has been enough of a debate with regard to the ‘Spirit of Cricket.’ If it is within the ‘Laws of Cricket’ then that should be enough.
(Shiamak Unwalla, a reporter with CricketCountry, is a self-confessed Sci-Fi geek who loves cricket more than cricketers. His Twitter handle is @ShiamakUnwalla)
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.