Home > Features >

Yuvraj Singh: The bigger question

The treatment served by the public to Yuvraj Singh for one failure in a crucial match will scar a generation of cricketers to come © Getty Images
The treatment served by the public to Yuvraj Singh for one failure in a crucial match will scar a generation of cricketers to come © Getty Images

As Yuvraj Singh has been targeted by the Indian public, Abhishek Mukherjee raises a bigger issue than the country being a sporting nation at all.

So Yuvraj Singh has managed to do it. He has not done anything new, but just an encore of what Geoffrey Boycott and Mike Brearley had done in 1979, the entire West Indian side in 1983, Mike Gatting in 1983, Stuart Law in 1996, Misbah-ul-Haq in 2007, among several others.

How do the blind fans see it?

The loyal fans, of course, will mention the following:

- He had been a part of all three World tournament winning sides for India;

- He has hit six sixes in a six-ball over;

- He was the Man of the Series in the World Cup, dominating almost each and every match;

- He had been a part of that NatWest Final chase;

- For a time, from 2005 to 2007, he was probably the best batsman in the world in One-Day Internationals (ODIs);

- Despite his failure, he is still twelfth in the T20I rankings, at par with the recently-retired Mahela Jayawardene;

- He is a cancer survivor;

- Many, many more.

And, of course, one can expect him to come back.

How do the neutrals see it?

He has had his days. He has made us proud, but that does not mean we will keep on playing him irrespective of his form. If we have to go by reputation, we can get Sunil Gavaskar, Kapil Dev, and Sachin Tendulkar in the side. He looks nowhere close to his best, and it’s time the selectors move on without him.

Having said that, he remains, and will remain one of the greatest ODI cricketers India has ever produced. There have not been many people who have won the Man of the Series in a World Cup. Nothing can take that away from him.

How the mob saw it

It was because of the 10 balls he could not (not did not, but could not) score off that India lost. There was no other reason for them to lose. He tried, but that did not matter: what mattered was the fact that he did not deliver over a span of about half an hour.

He is not there to be targeted, so go after his family instead. The house is unprotected. There are no goons surrounding his place. What can the people at the home do? Call the police? We will run away before that.

Verdict of the civilised section of the world

It was not the right thing to do. Nobody has the right of getting personal and physical with a person who has done so much for our country. He has done so much to make us proud; he has made a comeback after fighting cancer. How dare the mob go after him? We do not live in a civilised society! How can you go after the person you all worshipped three years back?

The same player who won us the World Cup, remember? © Getty Images
The same player who won us the World Cup, remember? © Getty Images

The bigger issue

It’s not about Yuvraj at all. The real question we should ask ourselves is: Why is the pedigree of the player important while we express our emotions at a cricketer’s house being stoned? Should it not be the same for everyone?

By some turn of events, a talented individual may rise astronomically and find a place in the upcoming World Cup squad; he does not get to play the matches, but thanks to some last-moment injuries and a few players losing form he makes his debut in the final (the way Yusuf Pathan had in the 2007 World Twenty20). Suppose the person does not have any history of performing for India, does not have a fan base, and ends up doing exactly what Yuvraj did on Saturday night.

Ask yourself: Now that we are not talking of a World Cup hero or a cancer survivor, but an ordinary debutant who has let his team down during a crunch moment, is pelting his house with stones morally and lawfully correct?

The issue does not lie with the pedigree of the cricketer: it lies with the fact that the person is either incompetent or had a bad day, but hasn’t done anything criminal. He has not performed: he has not committed a sin. He can be penalised by the authority (the national selectors in this case) for the same; he can be shunned by the public in cafes and pubs and offices and houses and on social network; but neither he nor his family should be assaulted personally.

It is not even about taking law in your own hands. It is about making people circumspect from going into a profession where you do not run the risk of your family being attacked while you’re away. That was what the mob had done that day: they had scared a generation of youngsters to take up the profession.

(Abhishek Mukherjee is the Deputy Editor and Cricket Historian at CricketCountry. He blogs at http://ovshake.blogspot.in and can be followed on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/ovshake42)

West Indies in South Africa, 2014-15

Dec 26, 2014 (14:00 IST)   at Port Elizabeth

Sri Lanka tour of New Zealand, 2014-15

Dec 26, 2014 (03:30 IST)   at Christchurch

India tour of Australia, 2014-15

Dec 26, 2014 (05:00 IST)   at Melbourne

West Indies in South Africa, 2014-15

Jan 2, 2015 (14:00 IST)   at Cape Town

Sri Lanka tour of New Zealand, 2014-15

Jan 3, 2015 (03:30 IST)   at Wellington

More

Pakistan vs New Zealand in UAE, 2014

Dec 19, 2014  at Abu Dhabi

New Zealand won by 68 runs

India tour of Australia, 2014-15

Dec 17, 2014  at Woolloongabba, Brisbane

Australia won by 4 wkts

Pakistan vs New Zealand in UAE, 2014

Dec 17, 2014  at Abu Dhabi

New Zealand won by 7 runs

West Indies in South Africa, 2014-15

Dec 17, 2014  at Centurion

South Africa won by an innings and 220 runs

England tour of Sri Lanka, 2014

Dec 16, 2014  at Colombo

Sri Lanka won by 87 runs

Photos

India vs Australia, 2nd Test at Brisbane

Videos

Ind vs Aus: Dhoni analyses the 4-wicket loss at Brisbane

India vs Australia 2014-15, 2nd Test at Brisbane: Mitchell Johnson’s performance in 2nd Test has ominous signs for India

Akshar Patel picked far too early for Test cricket

Shahid Afridi, please do not take the innocence away from cricket

South Africa vs West Indies 2014-15: Is Jason Holder a captain or a stooge?

Can Eoin Morgan change England’s limited-overs fortunes?

Anil Kumble Australia India Interviews Moments in history Ricky Ponting

Shane Watson in distress after being hit by bouncer; Australia’s training session ends abruptly

India vs Australia 2014-15, 3rd Test at Melbourne: India desperate for comeback against Australia to save Test series

Sri Lanka vs New Zealand 2014-15: Mighty Lankans begin final build-up to World Cup against Kiwis

Alastair Cook participates in World Darts Championships following World Cup axe

South Africa not worried about Test rankings, says Dale Steyn and Hashim Amla

MS Dhoni arrives in international cricket

Dickie Bird and the mobile phone story: a tall tale?

New Zealand vs Sri Lanka 2014-15: Can New Zealand benefit from Kane Williamson’s captaincy in Tests?

India vs Australia 2014-15, 2nd Test at Brisbane: Mitchell Johnson’s performance in 2nd Test has ominous signs for India

South Africa vs West Indies 2014: Chance for Rilee Rossouw to make his mark

Fan of the Day

Niharika Shah

Niharika Shah

683 Posts | 6 Fans

Mitchell Johnson's 37 wickets against England in Ashes 2013-14

प्रसिद्ध कथक नृत्यांगना सितारा देवी नहीं रही

More broadband connections to boost GDP growth in Asia Pacific: GSMA

India is becoming our largest overseas market, Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun says

Bigg Boss 8: Ali Quli Mirza, Renee Dhyani, Upen Patel, Praneet Bhatt, Sonali Raut – who should be evicted this week?

Revealed: The reason why Kishore Kumar’s biopic starring Ranbir Kapoor won’t feature Katrina Kaif!

अभिनेत्री प्रियंका चोपड़ा ने स्वच्छ भारत अभियान में हिस्सा लिया

Also on cricketcountry.com

Play Fantasy Cricket & Win

Cash Daily! Click here