Charles Kortright’s response: one could not have batted against both Larwood and me
Charles Kortright’s response: one could not have batted against both Larwood and me
Whether Charles Kortright was quicker than Harold Larwood remains a matter of debate.
Written by Arunabha Sengupta Published: Oct 14, 2014, 07:30 AM (IST) Edited: Jan 08, 2016, 11:07 PM (IST)
Charles Kortright. Photo Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons
The relative speed of fast bowlers across the ages is always a matter of great interest to cricket lovers. However, asking the old fast bowlers is not always the best idea. Arunabha Sengupta recounts the response of fiery old Essex fast bowler Charles Kortright, dated November 25, 1946, when asked about his pace.
 When he passed away in 1952, Charles Kortright was described by Wisden as âprobably the fastest bowler in the history of the gameâ. A lot of old-timers agreed. By then the world had already seen the likes of Harold Larwood and Ray Lindwall.
According to Sir Stanley Jackson, Charles Kortright was not only the fastest bowler of his times, but a very good one. He played between 1889 and 1907, and many a tall feat is associated with his name. John Arlott called him one of the greatest players never to appear in a Test match.
William Gunn of Nottinghamshire, one of the greatest batsmen of the era, was bowled by a Kortright delivery during a Gentleman versus Players game. He confessed that the ball had been a yard faster than anything he had ever faced. A ball in a club match at Wallingford supposedly rose straight from the wicket and went to the boundary on the full â making him perhaps the only bowler to bowl six byes. The claim, however, is perhaps a bit farfetched. Rules would have kept it down to four.
There is another claim that when he bowled Bill Brockwell of Surrey with a yorker, the ball rebounded from the bottom of the stumps and went back past the bowler almost to the boundary. And Kortright was vicious as well when his pace was slighted. Playing an army side he was once annoyed when he saw one of the officers facing him with a raised left toe. Kortright explained to the offender that he allowed no one but WG himself to cock his toe at him. When the batsman continued to face him the same way, Kortright blitzed the offending foot with yorkers until he caught it with a direct hit and broke it.
The fire in personality did not mellow with age. In 1946, the 75-year-old Kortright received a letter from cricket writer James D Coldham which enquired about his assessment of his own pace. Kortrightâs short and immensely colourful response is given below:
âEarlywood
Brook St Hill
Brentwood
Essex,
25th Novr, 1946.
Dear Mr Coldham,
I am very pleased you take such an interest in the grand old game of cricket, especially during the period I was taking more or less active part in it â 1890-1906. The question (personal) you ask me is an impossible one for me to answer as I have never played my own bowling, and after having been relegated to the long list of have-beens and forgotten for about 30 years, I was only dug up by a few ignorant so-called cricket reporters as a means of comparison with the pace of Harold Larwood, the Notts and England fast bowler in the Douglas Jardine expedition, when Australia got some of their own medicine and couldnât stomach it. The best way to compare the pace of any bowler with another is to bat against both of them in my opinion which in most cases is impossible.
Yours sincerely
CHAS. J KORTRIGHT.â
His delivery was as brisk and sharp as ever.
 (Arunabha Sengupta is a cricket historian and Chief Cricket Writer at CricketCountry. He writes about the history and the romance of the game, punctuated often by opinions about modern day cricket, while his post-graduate degree in statistics peeps through in occasional analytical pieces. The author of three novels, he can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/senantix)
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.