03:54 PM: The panel of the three former judges have been given six months to decide on the consequences and punishments.
— Bishan Bedi (@BishanBedi) January 22, 2015
03:35 PM: BIG NEWS:N Srinivasan cannot stand for elections to become the president of the BCCI. This is perhaps the biggest blow to him so far. The elections have to be held within six weeks.
The implications of this judgement seem vast. Much much more to happen still.
03:28 PM: The BCCI will not be allowed to decide what course of action is to be taken against the franchises Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals. It is indicating towards an independent body. Justice Lodha, Justice Ravindran and Justice Bhan will be in that committee. This will be the judicial committee that will decide on the fate.
Court giving its view on conflict of interest, independent committee made of senior judges to rule on future of franchises
03:26 PM: About Sundar Raman, the Supreme Court is saying that the allegations need to be investigated more to be established.
03: 20 PM: Supreme Court is delving into the conflict of interest. It has said that it “looms large” when the official is a franchise owner.
03:15 PM: The controversial clause which allowed board officials to own franchises has been declared null and void by the Supreme Court. Though it initially said that the amendment was fine, it has been struck down in the view of the conflict of interest established here.
03:13 PM: Supreme Court has rejected N Srinivasan’s claims that he was the main owner of India Cements. The Supreme Court has called it misleading.
03:12 PM: Supreme Court is making observations about the bias against the Chennai Super Kings.
03:10 PM: Supreme Court says that by being the BCCI President, and with him already being the owner of the Chennai Super Kings, that only created a situation of conflict of interest.
03:00 PM: Times Now reports that the charges of cover-up against N Srinivasan have not been established. There is only “suspicion of cover up” says Supreme Court. Hence there is no prove. Amendment to clause 6.2.4 regarding administrators holding commercial interesting have been upheld by Supreme Court.
02:55 PM: Supreme Court has also said that the accusations were proved against Raj Kundra, by the Justice Mukul Mudgal-led committee. It has also said that Kundra was given a chance to be heard.
02:52 PM: You can read about some of the Supreme Court’s decisions here.
02:47 PM: Supreme Court has said that the BCCI can be subject to judicial review, reports Times Now. The channel has also reported that the Supreme Court says that the BCCI’s functions are “public functions.”
02:44 PM: Gurunath Meiyappan involved in betting, says Supreme Court. The court has also established that he and Raj Kundra were team officials of their respective franchises.
02:42 PM: We are expecting the verdict any time now. N Srinivasan would be awaiting his fate. Everything will be clear in a few minutes from now
Landmark ruling by SC fr good of Indn Crkt-BCCI integrity questioned most glaringly & ever so aptly!
Supreme Court (SC) will give it’s final verdict in the Indian Premier League (IPL) spot-fixing case which shocked everyone in the cricketing sphere. This judgement would be very crucial for N Srinivasan who is currently the President of the Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI) and the chairman of the International Cricket Council (ICC). While for IPL franchise Chennai Super Kings (CSK) it would also be a crucial judgement. This judgement is crucial because BCCI elections have been delayed for the judgement.
According to ANI, it is expected that the fate of suspended Board of Control for Cricket in India president N. Srinivasan and his IPL team Chennai Super Kings will be determined on Thursday. Srinivasan, who is seeking a third term as BCCI president, is facing serious charges of conflict of interest as a cricket administrator.
His son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan is in the eye of the storm for betting. On December 17, when the Supreme Court broke for the winter break, the Special Bench comprising Justice T.S. Thakur and F.M. Kalifullah reserved its order on the corruption case after listening to final round of arguments.
The case dates back to June 2013 when Aditya Verma, secretary of the Cricket Association of Bihar (CAB), raised charges of a conflict of interest in the BCCI’s original two-member inquiry panel for the IPL corruption issue. A Bombay High Court ruling later termed the probe panel “illegal”.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.