[caption id="attachment_713637" align="alignnone" width="628"]<img class="size-full wp-image-713637" alt="Mohammad Hafeez Getty Images" src="https://www.cricketcountry.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Muhammad-Hafeez-of-Pakistan.jpg" width="628" height="355" /> Mohammad Hafeez Getty Images[/caption] <p></p> <p></p><a href="www.cricketcountry.com/players/mohammed-hafeez">Mohammed Hafeez </a> has managed to irk his board after raising concerns over <a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tag/ICC">ICC </a>s process of dealing with suspect action. Pakistan Cricket Board (<a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tag/PCB">PCB</a>) has now issued a show-cause notice to Hafeez, following his rant on ICC, after he was cleared for suspect action for the third time in his career. According to reports on <em>The </em><i>Indian Express</i>, Hafeez now has 14 days to respond to PCB s notice. <p></p> <p></p>Earlier, in an interview with <i>BBC Urdu, Hafeez said</i>: There are so many things influencing all this: it has a lot to do with the power of [some] boards and nobody wants to take them on. Mostly there are soft corners and relations between people which no one wants to spoil. What I say is why not implement the rule and get every bowler in the world to go through. What s the difficulty in that? <p></p> <p></p>Hafeez also expressed surprise at active cricketers who clearly flout the 15-degree limit: When match umpires called me, I went for my test only to find the flex was recorded up to 16, 17 and 18 degrees. I was surprised: how can anyone with the naked eye see flex from 15 to 16, when at times they are not able to call those whose flex is 25 and even 30-plus? So I have my doubts about this calling system. This is suspicious: why are match referees or on-field umpires not able to see those flexing up to 35 but me with 16 degrees?