×

There is always more to it than the mere words BCCI conveys

The BCCI is run by smart, successful leaders in India, be it politicians or businessmen. A lot of intelligence, real world skills and dollops of cunning are plentiful among the BCCI elite. Over time, I have realised that nothing the BCCI bigwigs do or say should be dismissed as nonsense, however strong the urge to do just that.

user-circle cricketcountry.com Written by Cricket Country Staff
Published: Feb 19, 2012, 10:25 AM (IST)
Edited: Feb 19, 2012, 10:25 AM (IST)

There is always more to it than the mere words BCCI conveys

For an organisation that makes up its own rules and accountable to no one, why the sudden need to convey that rules are important to them? © AFP

 

By Golandaaz

 

With the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), it is probably hard to report anything with a straight face. But almost all reports covering the predictable reunion of Sahara India Parivaar and the BCCI started off quoting Rajiv Shukla that “no rules were broken”.

 

I am not sure if the intent of these reports was to induce a roll of the eyes, a scoff, an uncontrolled involuntary laugh or it was just plain old reporting the news as it happened. However, I was curious as to why the BCCI would want to stress and communicate that it has broken no rules in mending relationships with Sahara.

 

The BCCI is run by smart, successful leaders in India, be it politicians or businessmen. A lot of intelligence, real world skills and dollops of cunning are plentiful among the BCCI elite. Over time, I have realised that nothing the BCCI bigwigs do or say should be dismissed as nonsense, however strong the urge to do just that. So when the BCCI says the they are rejecting the Woolf Report or want us to know that “no rules were broken” or they are unwilling to take a “leap of faith” with the Decision Review System (DRS) or they make statements like “players are free to request rest” there is more to it than mere words and the meaning it conveys.

 

For an organisation that makes up its own rules and accountable to no one, why the sudden need to convey that rules are important to them? I don’t know. Maybe the message they wanted to send out was that the BCCI came out tops in spite of Sahara threatening to do a BCCI on the BCCI but could not quite pull it off.

 

Moving on… it’s been a while since we have heard Mahendra Singh Dhoni or any of the guys who care to front up to the media use the ‘Process’ line. “It is important to follow the process. The results will take care of itself,” was a line frequently used in South Africa, through the World Cup and, I think, even in England. Lately, however, with the advent of some public airing of differing views on finishing wins, the process line has been rotated for a new term….”The rotation policy”. But before that, I must say that the way Gautam Gambhir and Dhoni openly presented differing views on finishing off games has been refreshing. It is healthy. I don’t remember any Indian team who were open about their disagreements.

 

I don’t know if there is any meat to reports that Virender Sehwag has captaincy aspirations. If he does, I am only happy. If he disagrees with Dhoni and he believes he can do a better job, he should go for the job. There is no value in having someone like Anil Kumble. In hindsight he would have been a great captain after Sourav Ganguly, but who knew?

 

Lately, there has been much talk about “The Rotation Policy”. I don’t know what the fuss is about. All knowing, presumptuous, cynical cricket fans like me can see through it. Sachin Tendulkar needs to score his 100th and preparations to defend the World Cup have to start. These are conflicting goals. In classic management consultant style, Dhoni has coined a term – “Rotation Policy”. It has got to do with not addressing the problem and not knowing what to do with the biggest elephant in the rooms. Watch how the policy disappears once Tendulkar gets his 100th. Something convenient will happen for the policy to be rotated like the ‘Process takes care of the results line’.

 

In a recent tweet, Harsha Bhogle had this to say…”I believe England’s woeful record in Asia can change if they embrace the continent and its culture. They have the team to do it.”

 

It got me thinking. Firstly it implies that England haven’t embraced the continent and the Asian culture. Secondly, would he implicate India with doing the same? Do we lose in England and Australia because we don’t embrace the two countries? Do Indians appreciate the English / Western culture? Or do we still believe Gandhi’s joke about it being a “good idea” as a serious opinion.

 

(Golandaaz is a blogger @Opinions on Cricket and likes to see the humorous side of the game. He often sketches cricketers in black and white. You can follow Golandaaz his blog on Twitter @oponcrFacebook/Opinions on Cricket)

TRENDING NOW