This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
BCCI vs Lodha Committee: Anurag Thakur says he never asked Shashank Manohar to speak on govt interference
Anurag Thakur said that he had not asked Shashank Manohar to state that the appointment of Justice R M Lodha committee would mean government interference in BCCI.
Written by Press Trust of India
Published: Oct 17, 2016, 04:10 PM (IST)
Edited: Oct 17, 2016, 04:10 PM (IST)


New Delhi (PTI) Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) President Anurag Thakur today said in Supreme Court that he had not asked ICC CEO Shashank Manohar to state that the appointment of Justice R M Lodha committee would “tantamount to government interference” in the functioning of BCCI. Thakur said he had taken part in a recent ICC meeting where he had pointed out to the ICC chief that he, as the then BCCI President, had taken a view that Justice Lodha panel recommendation on appointment of a CAG nominee in the apex council would amount to governmental interference and may invoke action of suspension of the Board from the ICC. READ: BCCI vs Lodha Committee: A timeline of events
“I am filing this affidavit pursuant to the order dated October 7, passed by this court on whether I had asked the CEO of the ICC to state that the appointment of Justice Lodha Committee was tantamount to government interference in the working of the BCCI. At the outset, it is denied that any such request was put forth by me to the CEO of the ICC,” Thakur said in his affidavit. I, therefore, requested him that he being the ICC chairman, can a letter be issued clarifying the position which he had taken as BCCI President,” the affidavit said. READ: BCCI perplexed over payment issues in wake of Lodha Committee report
“Manohar explained to me at the meeting that when the stand was taken by him, the matter was pending before this court and had not been decided,” Thakur said. The affidavit further said the apex court had later rejected BCCI’s contention that the appointment of CAG nominee in the council would amount to governmental interference.
TRENDING NOW
The apex court had held that the ICC would appreciate that the appointment would bring transparency in the finances of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The apex court had on October 7 directed Thakur to explain by filing a “personal affidavit”, the allegation “whether he had asked the CEO of the ICC to state that the appointment of Justice Lodha Committee was tantamount to government interference in the working of the BCCI”.