<div class="img-caption-wrap "> <img alt="ICC trying best to facilitate resolution between BCCI and CSA: Dave Richardson" src="https://st2.cricketcountry.com/wp-content/uploads/cricket/image_20130929194711.jpg" title="ICC trying best to facilitate resolution between BCCI and CSA: Dave Richardson" /> <p class="imgcaptionnew" style="width:618px;"> Dave Richardson said member countries of the ICC had not given the governing body any authority to decide the Future Tours Programme © Getty Images</p> </div> <strong>Johannesburg: Sep 29 , 2013 </strong><br /> <br /> The <a href="/tags/ICC/post" target="_blank">International Cricket Council</a> (ICC) does not like the <a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/title/BCCI_CSA-feud/post" target="_blank">current dispute between</a> the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Cricket South Africa (CSA), ICC chief executive Dave Richardson said on Sunday.<br /> <br /> "ICC does not like the fact that two of its strongest members are in dispute and we are doing what we can to facilitate a resolution," Richardson told the weekly <em>Sunday Times</em>.<br /> <br /> Richardson was commenting on the spat between the two cricket bodies about <a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tags/India-tour-of-South-Africa-2013_14/post" target="_blank">a tour to South Africa by India.</a><br /> <br /> CSA had earlier released a three-month schedule from November, but <a href="/tags/BCCI/post" target="_blank">BCCI </a>announced another tour plan which will seriously cut back on the <a href="/tags/CSA/post" target="_blank">CSA </a>plans.<br /> <br /> The dispute is allegedly because of dissatisfaction that CSA appointed former ICC chief executive Haroon Lorgat as chief executive, despite protestations from BCCI.<br /> <br /> Richardson said member countries of the ICC had not given the governing body any authority to decide the Future Tours Programme (FTP) because this schedule was determined by agreement between the full ICC members.<br /> <br /> "The members have not given ICC any authority to interfere in the FTP arrangements. At best we can play a facilitating role," Richardson said<br /> <br /> Asked if it is "dangerously unhealthy for the global game that one member, India, holds so much power", Richardson was cautious in his response.<br /> <br /> "It is always dangerous if one organisation has too much power. When that happens it is, of course, essential that the entity exercises its power responsibility," Richardson said.<br /> <br /> Analysts in South Africa estimated that the cancelation of the tour by India could cost CSA up to R300m. <br /> <br /> However, Richardson explained that cricket is benefiting enormously from the revenues generated from the subcontinent, in particular India.<br /> <br /> "Money generated from India touring a country is significantly greater than revenues generated by any other country," Richardson said.<br /> <br /> "In most cases a tour by India almost single-handedly sustains cricket in that country. Without it they would be decidedly poorer," he added.<br /> <br /> In the past six years, CSA has earned profit only in years when India visited the country, including the IPL 2 and the Champions Trophy.<br /> <br /> IPL 2 was played in South Africa due to security concerns around elections at the time in India.<br /> <br /> Richardson remained optimistic about the dispute being resolved.<br /> <br /> "I think they will. Historically, South Africa and India have been the strongest of allies. The game needs them both," he concluded.