[caption id="attachment_711698" align="alignnone" width="628"]<img class="size-full wp-image-711698" alt=" Getty Images (File Photo)" src="https://www.cricketcountry.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Mohammad-Hafeez.jpg" width="628" height="355" /> Getty Images (File Photo)[/caption] <p></p> <p></p>Pakistan s <a href="www.cricketcountry.com/players/mohammed-hafeez">Mohammed Hafeez</a> has constantly been called up for suspect action by umpires and has been under constant radar from International Cricket Council (<a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tag/ICC">ICC</a>). Hafeez, cleared for the third time last week by ICC to bowl, has now raised concerns over the whole process in an interview with <em>BBC Urdu</em>: "There are so many things influencing all this: it has a lot to do with the power of [some] boards and nobody wants to take them on. Mostly there are soft corners and relations between people which no one wants to spoil. What I say is why not implement the rule and get every bowler in the world to go throug. What's the difficulty in that? <p></p> <p></p>Hafeez also expressed surprise at active cricketers who clearly flout the 15-degree limit: "When match umpires called me, I went for my test only to find the flex was recorded up to 16, 17 and 18 degrees. I was surprised: how can anyone with the naked eye see flex from 15 to 16, when at times they are not able to call those whose flex is 25 and even 30-plus? So I have my doubts about this calling system. This is suspicious: why are match referees or on-field umpires not able to see those flexing up to 35 but me with 16 degrees?