[caption id="attachment_694804" align="aligncenter" width="594"]<a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Shami-3211.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-694804" alt="Mohammed Shami Getty Images" src="https://www.cricketcountry.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Shami-3211.jpg" width="594" height="355" /></a> Mohammed Shami Getty Images[/caption] <p></p> <p></p>Few hours after the<a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tag/bcci"> Board of Control for Cricket in India</a>'s (BCCI) Anti-Corruption Unit gave clean chit to <a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/players/mohammed-shami/">Mohammed Shami</a>, lawyer of the Indian pacer's wife Hasin Jahan said that his client had never verbally or in written made match-fixing allegations against Shami. <p></p> <p></p>Earlier in the day, BCCI's Anti-Corruption Unit gave a clean chit to Shami and also included the pacer in Grade B of the board's annual retainer contracts after they found no evidence of match-fixing against the Indian pacer. <p></p> <p></p>It was confirmed that the ACU head <a href="https://www.cricketcountry.com/tag/neeraj-kumar">Neeraj Kumar</a> had submitted his confidential report to the CoA and that the Supreme Court-appointed committee was of the view that there is no further action required against Shami under the BCCI anti-corruption code. <p></p> <p></p>Disappointed with the decision, Hasin Jahan's lawyer Zakir Hussain asked, what parameters were BCCI's investigations based on, while adding that his client's allegation was never about match-fixing. <p></p> <p></p>"My client's allegation was never about match fixing. I cannot raise any allegation on BCCI, but I want to know on what basis and parameters was BCCI's investigation based. We never made direct allegations of match-fixing on Mohammed Shami. Neither verbally nor in written," Hussain told the reporters. <p></p> <p></p>Last week, the Supreme Court-appointed Committee of Administrators (CoA) had written to the BCCI's ACU head Neeraj Kumar to investigate the charges levelled against Shami by his wife. <p></p> <p></p>The CoA, led by Vinod Rai, had given a seven-day deadline to Kumar to submit the report on the issue. <p></p> <p></p>This direction came after cricketer's wife levelled various allegations, including of match-fixing, against the fast bowler. <p></p> <p></p>Though Jahan retracted fixing allegation, the CoA had taken note of it and asked the ACU to investigate the matter. <p></p> <p></p>Earlier, a case was also registered against Shami on the basis of a written complaint filed by his wife, who has claimed that Shami has been having extra-marital affairs and abusing her physically and mentally. <p></p> <p></p>However, Shami had rejected all the allegations and said that someone was misleading his wife.