This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
MS Dhoni should know consequences of hurting religious sentiments: High Court
The Special Leave Petition filed by Dhoni will come up for hearing on September 14.
Written by Press Trust of India
Published: Sep 10, 2015, 10:13 PM (IST)
Edited: Sep 10, 2015, 10:13 PM (IST)


New Delhi: Cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni today moved the Supreme Court against Karnataka High Court order in a case filed against him for allegedly “denigrating” a Hindu god by posing as Lord Vishnu on a magazine cover page. The Special Leave Petition filed by Dhoni, challenging the Karnataka HC order which had refused to quash the criminal proceedings pending against him before a trial court in Bengaluru, will come up for hearing on September 14. The High Court had last month observed: “A celebrity and a cricketer like Dhoni should know the consequences of hurting religious sentiments of people. He should have known the consequences of doing such ads.” MS Dhoni moves to Supreme Court over his Lord Vishnu portray in Business Today
The complaint, filed by social activist Jayakumar Hiremath, had alleged that Dhoni was seen on the cover of a business magazine as Lord Vishnu, holding several things, including a shoe in his hands. The High Court had said, “These celebrities are only signing ads without any responsibility. Their aim is to earn easy money without considering the problems it may create.” MS Dhoni vs Virat Kohli: Who should captain India against South Africa in ODIs?
TRENDING NOW
Taking cognisance of the complaint filed by Hiremath, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) had registered a case against Dhoni under section 295 (injuring or defiling place of worship with intent to insult the religion of any class) along with 34 of the IPC. Later, the ACMM had issued summons to Dhoni to appear before the court, which he did not and instead moved the High Court against its direction. Poll: MS Dhoni or Virat Kohli, who should be India’s ODI captain?