This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
No BCCI member was snooped by UK company during my term, says Sanjay Patel
There were allegations that Page Protection Services snooped on BCCI officials.
Written by Press Trust of India
Published: Nov 20, 2015, 08:55 PM (IST)
Edited: Nov 20, 2015, 08:55 PM (IST)


New Delhi: Former BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel today said in his defence that UK-based company ‘Page Protection Services’, hired by the previous dispensation, “did not snoop on any board official” during his time in office. The BCCI has sent a letter to Patel asking him to clarify about the USD 900,000 payment made to the company for allegedly carrying out 24×7 surveillance on some of the key Board officials. This happened when N Srinivasan was calling the shots in BCCI. “I had deactivated my BCCI email account, the very day after I relinquished office (last March). I have sought for the MoU from the BCCI since I don’t have any documents with me. Once they give me that, I will file my reply. But I am putting this on record, no such instruction was given to the company regarding snooping on individuals,” Patel told PTI today. READ: N Srinivasan’s confidant, Sanjay Patel, suspended from Baroda Cricket Association
When asked as to what prompted BCCI to hire such a company, Patel replied: “I don’t think there was any work order given. There was a point of time when BCCI e-mail was hacked. In order to prevent important documents being leaked through twitter, we signed an MoU with this company. “Everything was done after due diligence. It was done for the sake of security. We never ever told them to carry out surveillance on individuals.” Sanjay Patel: It is a very balanced team selection
TRENDING NOW
Patel said that there is a 50-page report that was filed by the company (Page Protection) on security awereness measures that BCCI needed to take, “They had submitted a 50-page report where we were told about the possible protective measures we need to take in order to keep the important documents safely. Therefore, any allegations of snooping is not correct.”