This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Ousted Tim May focused on ICC’s terms of governance
Preferring not to say it in as many words, former Australian spinner and FICA boss Tim May today made a veiled reference to his ouster from the ICC's Cricket Committee, saying he is more interested in the apex body "policing" and maintaining its stated "governance".
Written by Press Trust of India
Published: May 07, 2013, 09:06 PM (IST)
Edited: May 07, 2013, 09:06 PM (IST)


Tim May (pictured here in 1993) said that the decision to appoint Laxman Sivaramkrishnan to the ICC Cricket Committee won’t affect FICA’s operations © Getty Images
By Kushan Sarkar
New Delhi: May 7, 2013
Preferring not to say it in as many words, former Australian spinner and FICA boss Tim May today made a veiled reference to his ouster from the ICC’s Cricket Committee, saying he is more interested in the apex body “policing” and maintaining its stated “governance”.
There have been allegations that the BCCI forced some of the captains of the member boards to vote in favour of former India leg-spinner Laxman Sivaramkrishnan, who is also a commentator on BCCI payrolls as well as an India Cements employee, which is owned by N Srinivasan.
“Indeed I am more focused on the ICC policing its own stated standards in terms of governance; this is the real issue not whether I got voted onto this committee,” May told PTI in an exclusive interview from the United States, where he currently resides.
Asked whether he feels there has been a deliberate attempt on part of any particular cricket board to influence other member boards, May replied, “This is an issue that has been identified and raised by a number of parties for a significant number of years including Woolf Committee’s report on ICC’s governance.”
Was he ousted because he was a vocal advocate of implementation of DRS across all Test-playing nations which India has always opposed, he gave a curt reply, “It might be best to ask the BCCI.”
There is a perception about May being anti-BCCI but the former offie sought to clear the air.
“There are some aspects of BCCI that I am a strong supporter of and there are other aspects that concern me and others. Unfortunately, only the negative stuff gets publicised,” he replied.
May also feels that the decision to appoint Sivaramkrishnan won’t affect FICA’s operations.
TRENDING NOW
“Not much, we are formally recognised by the ICC as a recognised Players’ Representative (For The Players Under The FICA Banner), so we will continue to consult and negotiate with the ICC.”