PCB chief Zaka Ashraf has been a staunch critic of ICC's three-tier policy © Getty Images
PCB chief Zaka Ashraf has been a staunch critic of ICC’s three-tier policy © Getty Images


Karachi: Feb 8, 2014


The Chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board(PCB) Zaka Ashraf said that the widespread change in the International Cricket Council (ICC’s) governance and structure, initiated by the India, Australia and England cricket boards, would harm world cricket.


“This much stress on money matters is going to harm world cricket in the future,” Ashraf told a Pakistani news channel from Singapore where the ICC Executive Board meeting took place.


Ashraf, whose own future as the PCB chief is uncertain with strong reports that the government is planning to replace him next week, said Pakistan had stuck to its stance which it had taken when the draft proposals were presented by the “Big Three”.



                                  Catch all the stories on ICC’s Big Three proposal and other key events here



“Obviously we are disappointed that South Africa chose to vote in favour of the changes at the last minute but Pakistan and Sri Lanka stood firm together. We will not change our stance,” Ashraf said.


“Greed is never good for any sport…that is our stance and we now have to see what happens in the future. But as a board, Pakistan is still firm on its stance,” he added.


A senior board official said that Ashraf during the International Cricket Council meeting had made it clear that the proposed changes if implemented would lead to polarisation and groupings in the ICC and world cricket.


Ashraf said that the Indian cricket board and the other boards had indicated lot of gain for Pakistan cricket if it voted in favour of the changes.


“But we stuck to our stance and so did Sri Lanka, so we were not alone in our resistance to these changes,” he said.


Interestingly, before leaving for the Singapore meeting, Ashraf had said that Pakistan would eventually take decision based on its own interest and benefits.


Former chairman of the PCB, Tauqir Zia felt that Pakistan cricket itself was facing internal problems and challenges, so one could understand the difficulties the present set up would face resisting the changes in the ICC.


“We need to first get rid of ad-hocism in our cricket set up and have a permanent Chairman for at least four years.


Right now the situation is that even the future of Zaka Ashraf is uncertain,” said Zia.


He said it was cricket’s misfortune that the proposals were approved at ICC’s meeting because it would only lead to politics and groupings among the member nations now.


Another former chairman, Ijaz Butt said Pakistan cricket had taken a principled stance but it now remained to be seen whether it would be punished for its stance.


“We have to consider that from 2015 onwards the FTP will no longer be in control of the ICC and now all the boards will decide bilateral series for the next eight years among themselves.


“I think in this scenario we needed to do a lot of lobbying. But the way South African board backed out  is unfortunate,” he said.