×

Supreme Court allayes BCCI’s apprehension on inclusion of CAG nominee

Supreme Court allayed BCCI's apprehension that it will face ICC's ire for carrying out drastic restructuring of the Board by including CAG nominee

user-circle cricketcountry.com Written by Press Trust of India
Published: Mar 04, 2016, 03:15 AM (IST)
Edited: Mar 04, 2016, 03:15 AM (IST)

KK Venugopal said that ICC rules clearly say that no government interference should be there in the functioning of boards © Getty Images (Representational Image)
KK Venugopal said that ICC rules clearly say that no government interference should be there in the functioning of boards © Getty Images (Representational Image)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday allayed BCCI‘s apprehension that it will face ICC‘s ire for carrying out drastic restructuring of the Board by including a CAG nominee into it saying the appointment under the judicial order does not amount to government interference. The apex court’s assurance came after senior advocate KK Venugopal, appearing for the BCCI, said implementing the Justice RM Lodha Committee recommendation to include CAG’s nominee in the Board will go against the rules of the ICC. To this the bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice FMI Kalifulla said whether BCCI apprehends that ICC may suspend it if a CAG nominee is appointed in the apex council. CK Nayudu Trophy 2015-16: Mumbai U-23 wins title

“The CAG nominee will not be exactly the government person, he will be a court appointed official in the board, then why there will any problems to ICC,” the bench said. However, when Venugopal said that ICC rules clearly say that no government interference should be there in the functioning of boards, the bench said, “You are discharging a public function. You want free hand while dealing with crores of rupees. Ex-servicemen league demands India vs Pakistan tie be scrapped from Dharamsala

TRENDING NOW

“Where is the government interference with the board? He [nominee] will be appointed by the authority of the court. What is the worry in that,” the bench asked. It asked the BCCI to tell ICC that the CAG nominee has been appointed by the Supreme Court to only look after any irregularities and misappropriation if any in the board. “Our interference doesn’t mean, government’s interference,” the bench said and added that it may consider the suggestion at a later stage that the nominee should have an advisory role in the board.