×

Virat Kohli, Ravi Shastri’s philosophy of aggression questioned by Sanjay Manjrekar

There was a bit of sarcasm in his article about what he believed was a misplaced sense of aggression.

user-circle cricketcountry.com Written by Press Trust of India
Published: Sep 08, 2015, 07:49 PM (IST)
Edited: Sep 10, 2015, 11:45 AM (IST)

Sanjay Manjrekar has hit out at Virat Kohli (above) and Ravi Shahstri © AFP
Sanjay Manjrekar has hit out at Virat Kohli (above) and Ravi Shastri over their philosophy of aggression © AFP

New Delhi: Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar has hit out at India’s Team Director Ravi Shastri and Test captain Virat Kohli questioning their philosophy of aggression after the Ishant Sharma incident resulted in a one-Test ban for the lanky Delhi fast bowler. “I am a bit concerned with the Virat Kohli-Ravi Shastri partnership. That the Indians are not trying to tone their behaviour down after Australia, and have got into ugly confrontations with even a team like Sri Lanka, tells me that they don’t see these actions as misdemeanours at all,” Manjrekar wrote in his column for ESPN Cricinfo. Sanjay Manjrekar criticises Ishant Sharma for overt aggression

TRENDING NOW

There was a bit of sarcasm in his article about what he believed was a misplaced sense of aggression. The 50-year-old Manjrekar, who has played 37 Tests and 74 ODIs for India between 1987 and 1996, asked as to why aggression did not win them games in Australia if that is a requisite element for winning matches. “But India may say, ‘We won the series, and this is what you need to be a winning team – a bit of aggression.’ A simple retort would be: Why didn’t aggression win you games in Australia?”

Manjrekar seemed equally disturbed by the trend of fast bowlers giving batsmen send-offs. “What I can’t understand why the bowler is seen angry even after dismissing a batsman? Because a wicket falling means the batsman has failed and the bowler has succeeded, then why should anger follow success? The Mumbaikar said this referring to one of the incidents involving Ishant had not caught the attention of TV cameras.