The suspension saga involving Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul took another twist on Saturday after BCCI acting president CK Khanna refused to convene a Special General Meeting for the appointment of an ombudsman as the matter is sub-judice.

Pandya and Rahul have been suspended pending an inquiry for their sexist comments on a TV chat show and the matter is pending in the Supreme Court. The Committee of Administrators running the BCCI wants Supreme Court to appoint an ombudsman to decide the fate of Pandya and Rahul.

Around 14 state units, mainly former BCCI president N Srinivasan’s loyalists, had requested Khanna to convene an emergent SGM, which needs to be called in 10 days.

Treasurer Anirudh Chaudhry also wrote to Khanna requesting for an early SGM, so that board members can take a call on the appointment of ombudsman.

Khanna, in his reply, made it clear that since the matter is sub-judice, he would like to wait.

“As per constitution of the BCCI, an ombudsman can be appointed at the Annual General Meeting (AGM). And moreover the matter (appointment of ombudsman) is already sub-judice,” Khanna replied to Chaudhry.

Khanna also sought BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary’s view and he also quoted article 40 of the new constitution on the appointment of ombudsman.

“Why would Khanna or Amitabh sign the notice for convening Special General Meeting when the matter is in Supreme Court. There would be a risk of Contempt of Court,” a senior BCCI official privy to the development told PTI on conditions of anonymity.

However, the official agreed that CoA chief Vinod Rai should have vetoed co-member Diana Edulji and taken a call on quantum of suspension for the two suspended cricketers.

“As per protocol, Mr Rai sought Diana’s suggestion but he could easily overrule her view of getting a legal opinion, which started this mess. He (Rai) could have easily done what he did in the women’s coach selection case,” the official observed.

The acting president has written a letter to COA, requesting them to let Pandya and Rahul play till quantum of punishment is decided.

“I urge for a meeting/discussion between Committee of Administrators and the office bearers to resolve this issue on priority,” Khanna wrote.