This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
IPL spot-fixing and betting controversy: Supreme Court refuses to stay Bombay High Court verdict
The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to stay a Bombay High Court order which held as illegal and unconstitutional in terms of cricketing bodies rules the two-member probe panel which gave a clean chit to Chennai Super Kings's Gurunath Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royals's Raj Kundra of alleged involvement in betting in the sixth version of IPL.
Written by Indo-Asian News Service
Published: Aug 07, 2013, 04:10 PM (IST)
Edited: Aug 07, 2013, 04:10 PM (IST)


Chennai Super Kings’s Team Principal Gurunath Meiyappan was given a clean chit in the BCCI two-member panel report © PTI
New Delhi: Aug 7, 2013
The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to stay a Bombay High Court order which held as illegal and unconstitutional in terms of cricketing bodies rules the two-member probe panel which gave a clean chit to Chennai Super Kings’s Gurunath Meiyappan and Rajasthan Royals’s Raj Kundra of alleged involvement in betting in the sixth version of IPL.
Declining to stay the high court order, the apex court issued notice to Cricket Association of Bihar asking it to respond to Board of Control for Cricket in India‘s (BCCI) plea within two weeks and gave another one week to the cricketing body to file its rejoinder to the reply by the Cricket Association of Bihar.
The apex court bench of Justice A.K. Patnaik and Justice J.S. Khehar issued notice after senior counsel C.A. Sundaram told the court that the setting up of the two-member probe panel comprising retired judges T. Jayarama Chouta and R. Balasubramanian was in accordance with the rules of the cricketing body.
TRENDING NOW
He found fault with the Bombay High Court order, contending that it ignores a provision in BCCI rules that gave it prerogative to set up such a probe panel.