South Africa claims no. 2 spot by winning the Test series against New Zealand by 1-0    AFP
South Africa claims no. 2 spot by winning the Test series against New Zealand by 1-0 AFP

Dubai: South Africa has finished second on the ICC Test Team Rankings at the April 1 cut-off date after the third and the final Test against New Zealand in Hamilton ended in a draw on Wednesday. The result, which gave South Africa a 1-0 series win, earned Faf du Plessis‘ side two ranking points and helped the Proteas move one point ahead of Australia in second place. In contrast, New Zealand dropped two rankings points and consequently slipped behind Pakistan into sixth place. FULL CRICKET SCORECARD: India vs Australia, 4th Test at Dharamsala

As New Zealand versus South Africa series was the last series to finish before the April 1 annual cut-off, South Africa’s number-two ranking has won it an award of five lakh dollars, while Australia has collected two lakh dollars. England, which ended up fourth, received one lakh dollars. On Tuesday, India had retained the mace and pocketed one million dollars following its 2-1 series win over Australia. It was India’s fifth successive series win in the 12-month period from 1 April 2016, following successes against the West Indies (2-0), New Zealand (3-0), England (4-0) and Bangladesh (1-0).

South Africa, in the same 12-month period, defeated New Zealand (1-0, both home and away), Australia (2-1) and Sri Lanka (3-0), while Australia lost to Sri Lanka (3-0), South Africa (2-1) and India (2-1) with its only series win being against Pakistan (3-0). Fourth-ranked England beat Sri Lanka (2-0), drew with Pakistan (2-2) and Bangladesh (1-1), and lost to India (4-0).

Following last year’s cut-off, Australia had started in number-one position on 112 points, followed by India (110), South Africa (109), Pakistan (106), England (102), New Zealand (96), Sri Lanka (89), West Indies (76), Bangladesh (47) and Zimbabwe (five).

The annual update of the ICC Test Team Rankings will next be carried out on May 1 with the series results from 2013-14 not to be included in the calculations and outcomes from the 2014-15 and 2015-16 series weighted at 50 per cent.